Direkt zum InhaltDirekt zur SucheDirekt zur Navigation
▼ Zielgruppen ▼

Sprach- und literaturwissenschaftliche Fakultät - Psycholinguistik (Gastprofessur)

Forschung


 

HORIZON2020: ERC Starter Grant "Focus alternatives in the human mind: Retrieval, representation, and recall" (FAHMRRR)

 

zur Projektseite

 


 

Sonderforschungsbereich 632 (abgeschlossen)

SFB 632, Projekt C7 „Einfluss sprachlicher und nicht-sprachlicher Kontextinformation auf die Verwendung informationsstruktureller Alternativen in Satzproduktion und Satzverständnis“

 

zur SFB-Seite

 

Bisheriger Output:

  • Burmester, J., Sauermann, A., Spalek, K., & Wartenburger, I. (2018). Sensitivity to salience: linguistic vs. visual cues affect sentence processing and pronoun resolution. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, doi:10.1080/23273798.2018.1428758.
  • Gotzner, N. & Spalek, K. (2017). The role of contrastive and non-contrastive alternatives in the interpretation of focus particles. Discourse Processes, 54, 638-654. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2016.1148981.
  • Spalek, K.*, & Zeldes, A.* (2017). Converging evidence for the relevance of alternative sets: Data from NPs with focus sensitive particles in German. Language and Cognition, 9, 24-51. doi:10.1017/langcog.2015.12. * shared first authorship
  • Gotzner, N., Wartenburger, I., & Spalek, K. (2016). The impact of focus particles on the recognition and rejection of contrastive alternatives. Language and Cognition, 8, 59-95, doi:10.1017/langcog.2015.25.
  • Burmester, J., Spalek, K., & Wartenburger, I. (2014). Context updating during sentence comprehension: The effect of aboutness topic. Brain and Language, 137, 62-76.
  • Gotzner, N., & Spalek, K. (2014). Exhaustive inferences and additive presuppositions: The interplay of focus operators and contrastive intonation. In J. Degen, M. Franke, & N. Goodman (Eds.), Proceedings of the Formal & Experimental Pragmatics Workshop, 7-13, Tübingen.
  • Spalek, K., Gotzner, N., Wartenburger, I. (2014). Not only the apples: Focus sensitive particles improve memory for information-structural alternatives. Journal of Memory and Language, 70, 68-84.
  • Spalek, K., Gotzner, N., & Wartenburger, I. (2014). Small words, big impact: How the focus particles “even” and “only” improve memory for sentence content. Atomium Culture.
  • Burmester, J., Wartenburger, I., & Spalek, K. (2013). The effect of discourse context on online sentence processing. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society [pp. 251-256]. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Gotzner, N., Spalek, K., & Wartenburger, I. (2013). How pitch accents and focus particles affect the recognition of contextual alternatives. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society [pp. 2434-2439]. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

 


 

DFG Sachbeihilfe “Wettbewerb in der Sprachproduktion” (abgeschlossen)  

 

zur DFG Seite

 

Bisheriger Output:

 

  • Damian, M. F., & Spalek, K. (2014). Processing different kinds of semantic relations in picture-word interference with non-masked and masked distractors. Frontiers in Psychology, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01183.
  • Spalek, K., Damian, M. F., & Bölte, J. (2013). Is lexical selection in spoken word production competitive? Introduction to the Special Issue on lexical competition in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 577-614.
  • Hutson, J., Damian, M. F., & Spalek, K. (2013). Distractor frequency effects in picture-word interference tasks with vocal and manual responses. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 615-632.
  • Spalek, K. Time-course data as evidence for lexical selection mechanisms. Invited paper presented at the International Workshop on Language Production, New York City, NY, USA, Juli 2012

 

 


 

Projekt “Wie produzieren komische Texte positive Emotionen?” am Exzellenzcluster Languages of Emotion (abgeschlossen)

 

zur LOE Seite